What is Credit Rating in Insurance: An In depth Overview

The assessment of an insurance company’s financial strength and its capability to fulfill policyholders’ claims is expressed through its credit rating as provided by an independent agency.

This rating does not serve as an indicator of the performance of the insurance company’s securities for investors.

An image illustration for What is Credit Rating in Insurance: An In depth Overview
What is Credit Rating in Insurance: An In depth Overview

Moreover, it is crucial to recognize that an insurance company’s credit rating is subjective in nature, constituting an opinion rather than an indisputable fact.

Furthermore, it’s noteworthy that ratings for the same insurance company can vary across different rating agencies.

This article delves into the intricacies of insurance company credit ratings, highlighting the variations in scales and the significance of these ratings for consumers and businesses.

Understanding Insurance Company Credit Ratings

Insurance company credit ratings play a crucial role in assessing an insurer’s financial stability and its ability to fulfill policyholders’ claims.

There are four major rating agencies, namely Moody’s, A.M. Best, Fitch, and Standard & Poor’s. It’s important to note that each agency employs its own rating scale, making direct comparisons challenging.

Different Rating Scales

Moody’s rates the highest quality as Aaa.
Fitch designates the exceptionally strong as AAA.
Standard & Poor’s reserves AAA for extremely strong.
A.M. Best’s top rating is A++, indicating superiority.

When comparing ratings across agencies, confusion may arise due to the differing scales. For instance, A.M. Best’s A+ (superior) should not be confused with Fitch’s A+ (strong).

Additionally, understanding the distinctions between ratings like A.M. Best’s C (weak) and Moody’s C (lowest rated) is crucial.

Special Considerations

Complex Structures: Large insurance entities, such as MetLife, Inc., consist of multiple subsidiaries.
Individual Ratings: Each subsidiary within a conglomerate holds its unique insurance company credit rating based on its financial strength, contributing to a comprehensive assessment.
Corporate Credit vs. Insurance Company Credit Ratings: It’s noteworthy that these subsidiary ratings differ from the parent company’s corporate credit ratings, encompassing evaluations of preferred stock and senior unsecured debt.

Benefits of Insurance Company Credit Ratings

Importance of Ratings: Many individuals and businesses rely on insurance companies to cover significant losses.
Preventing Insolvency: Insurance company credit rating agencies issue insurer financial strength ratings (IFS ratings) to prevent insolvency, ensuring the availability of funds for claim payouts and legal services.
Public Accessibility: IFS ratings are readily accessible to the public, allowing consumers to make informed decisions regarding an insurer’s credibility.

Consumer Vigilance

Assurance of Claim Payments: Consumers should check an insurance company’s credit ratings to ascertain its capacity to honor claims promptly.
Dependence on Insurers: In various scenarios, people and businesses depend on insurers to provide financial support for legal services, reinforcing the importance of reliable insurance company credit ratings.

Financial Strength Ratings

A Financial Strength Rating is a pivotal indicator of an insurance company’s ability to fulfill policyholder claims promptly and in full.

This rating serves as the linchpin for deriving credit ratings across various entities within the insurance landscape.

Financial Strength Ratings and Their Application

Financial Strength Ratings are not only applied to insurance operating companies but also extend to the encompassing holding company and the debt issued by both operating companies and the holding company.

The rating agencies, including Moody’s, Standard & Poor’s, and Fitch, employ these ratings as a foundation to formulate credit ratings for a holistic assessment.

Diverse Terminology Across Agencies

The terminology employed for Financial Strength Ratings may differ slightly among agencies.

While Moody’s refers to them as Insurance Financial Strength Ratings, Standard & Poor’s uses the term Financial Strength Rating, and Fitch opts for Insurer Financial Strength rating.

Despite these nuances, the underlying purpose remains consistent – to gauge an insurance company’s financial robustness.

Entities Under Scrutiny

Individual legal entities receive published credit ratings, including Financial Strength Ratings, instead of comprehensive insurance groups.

In the scenario where an insurance group encompasses multiple operating companies under a holding company, each operating company and the holding company are assigned separate ratings.

Global Methodologies with Regional Adjustments

Major agencies like S&P, Fitch, and Moody’s follow global methodologies for rating insurance companies. However, these methodologies are flexible enough to accommodate regional variances.

For instance, while S&P and Fitch share a methodology for rating Life and Non-Life companies, Moody’s employs slightly distinct methodologies for these categories.

Analyst Adjustments and Weightings

Analysts may exercise discretion in adjusting scores if they perceive a misalignment between the scores and the actual credit strength or weakness of a factor. Additionally, analysts may assign differing weights to credit factors, deviating from the standard weightings outlined in the rating methodology.

Assessment Criteria and Data Utilization

Analysts evaluate credit factors by combining historical data, forecasts from the insurance company, and stress tests.

They usually initiate their assessment with the insurance company’s published financial statements, but adjustments may be necessary if these statements adhere to local GAAP rather than IFRS.

Group Methodology and Notional Group Ratings

Agencies use group methodologies to assess individual entities within insurance groups.

Main operating companies get group ratings; holding companies may receive weaker ratings due to structural subordination.

Factors Influencing Individual Ratings within Groups

In a group methodology, agencies scrutinize the characteristics of operating companies to determine their individual ratings within the group.

Size compared to peers, location, brand distinction, and leverage significantly influence the assigned rating.

For example, an operating company with distinct characteristics may receive a lower rating than the group average.


Spread the love